Tuesday, 26 February 2008

Environmentalist, Greens & Co unmasked

One can’t help but notice the lengths that Environmentalist, Greens & Co (aka the Green Lobby) will go to, in their attempts to dish out “global guilt” with those of us who cherish freedom and choice, verses their “the end of the world is neigh” mentality.

In the United Kingdom, the target “de jour” is plastic bags, bottled water and air travel. Marks and Spencer plc, in its wisdom has decided that they intend to charge shoppers 0.5 pence for shopping bags in an effort to reduce consumption. Call me a cynic, but with the copious amounts of cellophane wrapping that come on just about anything you can by from M&S, I doubt very much if this nothing more than a public relations stunt. I suspect that with their propensity to wrap any and everything, they would wrap us poor shoppers in cellophane if they could get away with it.

It is one thing for a private enterprise such as M&S to pursue a commercial strategy built on the theory of the environmental / green lobby scare tactics; after all, they are in the business of making money! Where I draw the line, and firmly – Is the governments attempts to legislate in such areas. I knew it would not take long for New Labour to jump on this bandwagon, and Prime Minister Gordon Brown certainly did not disappoint, when he stated that he intends to pass legislation on this matter.

Least you be mistaken, it’s not just shopping bags! Shopping bags represent merely the thin edge of a very big wedge. Air travel and food is another one of those targets. Yes, I said food - Apparently, we are meant to feel guilty, that is those of us who like the fact that we currently have the choice to buy fruits and vegetable out of season and even treat ourselves to exotic fruits. The rationale for this is that, because these fruits and vegetables must be transported via air or road producing CO2 , this should be banned.

Environmentalist Green & Co, lobby incessantly to government arguing such unsustainable arguments that our right to travel should no longer be a right, because it is intrinsically bad. What make this argument so ridiculous is the fact that cargo, which is a by-product of air travel, is the only way third world producers can get their goods to the market in a timely manner. I make this point, because this same lobby argues and uses emotive language about how we should be doing so much more to help the Third World, yet by their very opaque arguments, they wish to curtail the very activity that stands a chance of helping to alleviate poverty.

What I find most egregious in all of this is the fact that the green lobby et alia, has been for far too long, unchallenged in their tactics and theories. They seek to monopolize any debate that can be held on this whole global warming theory. G-D forgive you, should you ever have any course to disagree. Irrespective of the propaganda, there are those of us whom fundamentally disagree. Just because it is the words of Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and others, does not take away the fact that it is propaganda none the less! Hell has no furry like an environmentalist scorned.

Balk all you want, I know I’m right, and why? Simple – if the argument has been won by the naysayers (Environmental Green & Co), they would not have to engage in tactics such as co-opting the government to do their dirty work. Instead they would make their argument to us the people, and let us decide if we share their premises – I suspect we already know the answer to this question – No. People saying they agree surely can’t count, its only actions that mater. After all in the case of shopping bags, we do have a choice. No one forces the consumer to take the shopping bag, or to travel for that matter. The mere fact that most of us are consumers speaks volumes. Let’s face it, most of us like the progress we have made as a civilization. We have no intention of living a lifestyle that is highly reminiscent of the stone ages.

I argue its time we found our collective voices. We are not in the pocket of big oil, just because we like the right to drive. We don’t own shares in Airlines because we like to travel. I say to the greens and their allies “Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further”. This cosy liberal elite consensus must be brought to a swift end before we find ourselves in grave danger. Just imagine if you will where we would be if we listen to the naysayers, when they argued the world was flat.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Welcome to the blogsphere.

It’s refreshing to see someone who dares to say, “…..we like the right to drive.” but be careful though, you might be charged with incitement to kill polar bears.